Islamic University VC Scores Dismal 2.45 in Student Evaluation Survey

Professor Dr. Naqib Muhammad Nasrullah, Vice-Chancellor of Islamic University (IU), received a score of 2.45 out of 10 in a student-led evaluation survey marking his first year in office, reflecting widespread dissatisfaction with his performance. The survey results were announced at a press conference held by the ‘Islamic University Reform Movement’ at the university’s Diana Chattar on Tuesday.

Conducted from September 18 to 23, the survey assessed the Vice-Chancellor’s performance across 10 key areas, including academic management, campus safety, and infrastructure development. A total of 1,312 students participated, with 876 residential and 436 non-residential respondents. Feedback was collected via online Google Forms and offline surveys across halls, departments, and the campus.

The rating scale categorized performance as follows: 1-3 (poor), 4-6 (average), 7-8 (good), and 9-10 (excellent). The Vice-Chancellor’s score of 2.45 places his performance in the “poor” category, indicating significant student discontent.

The survey posed 10 questions addressing critical aspects of university administration:
1. Effectiveness in resolving session jams and addressing teacher shortages.
2. Progress in securing justice for the murder of student Sajid Abdullah.
3. Efforts to ensure campus safety, discipline, and environmental sustainability.
4. Role in establishing the Islamic University Students’ Union (ICSU).
5. Contributions to modernizing online banking, labs, certificate issuance, and the university website.
6. Improvements in the quality and nutrition of residential hall food.
7. Initiatives to increase research funding and enhance research quality.
8. Enhancements in medical center services, mental health support, and other facilities.
9. Measures to ensure safety for female students, including common rooms and a secure environment.
10. Actions to address transportation issues, including bus allocation, removal of unfit vehicles, and efficient driver recruitment.

At the press conference, organizers expressed frustration, stating, “In the past year, we’ve seen promises but no tangible results.” They highlighted unfulfilled demands, including a 15-point charter submitted on September 9, which has seen no progress. The group also criticized a recent directive from the Student Advisor’s Office banning unauthorized gatherings, calling it an attempt to suppress their voices.

Defiant, the organizers said, “We demanded a roadmap for implementing our demands, but none was provided. This survey is part of our ongoing efforts to hold the administration accountable.” They concluded that the Vice-Chancellor’s low score reflects his failure to deliver over the past year.

The survey underscores growing tensions at IU, with students and organizations voicing concerns over administrative inaction. The poor evaluation score signals a broader call for reforms in academic, safety, and infrastructural management at the university.